Polymorphic malware is a sophisticated type of malicious software that dynamically changes its code to evade detection by traditional security tools. This adaptability, combined with techniques such as encryption, obfuscation, and code rewriting, makes it one of the most challenging threats in the field of cybersecurity. Below, we’ll explore the techniques employed by polymorphic malware, its evolution into metamorphic malware, and how these threats challenge traditional static analysis methods.
What is Polymorphic Malware?
Polymorphic malware alters its external code or structure with each new infection while retaining its malicious functionality. This variability is achieved using methods such as encryption, obfuscation, and dynamic code generation, making it difficult for signature-based detection systems to recognize the malware.
Core Techniques of Polymorphic Malware
- Code Obfuscation
- Description: Scrambles the malware’s code, making it appear different each time while maintaining its functionality.
- Impact: Signature-based detection tools are unable to recognize the obfuscated code as malicious due to its altered appearance.
- Self-Emulating Malware
- Description: Executes its payload through a virtual machine (VM) within the malware itself.
- Mechanism: Custom instructions are understood only by the malware’s VM, which translates them into actions equivalent to the original program.
- Benefit for Malware: Obfuscation through self-emulation makes reverse engineering and static analysis significantly harder.
- Encryption
- Description: Encrypts its payload using a unique key for each infection.
- How It Works:
- The malware contains an encryption engine to scramble its code into ciphertext.
- A decryption routine restores the original code at runtime.
- Advanced Forms: Polymorphic malware not only changes the encryption key but also modifies the encryption routine for every infection, making detection even harder.
- Oligomorphic Techniques
- Description: A precursor to polymorphism, oligomorphic malware changes its decryption routine but relies on a predefined set of variations.
- Limitation: While more advanced than static encryption methods, it is less versatile than fully polymorphic techniques.
How Polymorphic Malware Evades Detection
- Dynamic Encryption and Key Variability
- Traditional antivirus tools rely on consistent patterns for detection. Polymorphic malware avoids detection by using unique encryption keys and routines with each infection.
- Static Analysis Evasion
- Polymorphic malware’s encrypted payload appears as random data during analysis. Without executing the code, static analysis cannot uncover its true functionality.
- Behavior-Based Evasion
- Some polymorphic malware mimics benign behavior during analysis, making it difficult to differentiate from legitimate programs.
Metamorphic Malware: Polymorphism Taken Further
Metamorphic malware takes polymorphism to the next level by rewriting its entire code base with each infection. This advanced technique ensures that the malware appears entirely different every time it propagates.
How Metamorphic Malware Works
- Code Analysis: The malware begins by analyzing its own code.
- Code Mutation:
- Divides its code into blocks or segments.
- Mutates each block independently by:
- Changing instructions while preserving functionality.
- Reordering blocks without altering execution flow.
- Deep Structural Changes: The result is a fully transformed program that functions identically but is entirely different in structure.
Challenges of Metamorphic Malware
- Static Analysis: Nearly impossible due to the complete rewriting of code.
- Behavioral Patterns: Unlike polymorphic malware, metamorphic malware may also disguise its behavior, further complicating dynamic analysis.
Examples of Polymorphic and Metamorphic Malware Techniques
- Encrypted Payloads
- Polymorphic malware encrypts its payload using variable keys. A decryptor embedded in the malware restores the payload during runtime.
- Example: The malware uses a “shell game” approach, encrypting and decrypting data in a constantly changing manner.
- Tudor Malware
- Extracts an encrypted PE file from its resource section.
- Decrypts it using a multi-byte XOR key, further obfuscating the payload.
- Metamorphic Techniques
- Igor Mutic’s analogy: Metamorphic viruses “reshape their bodies” with every infection, akin to body polymorphics.
Countering Polymorphic and Metamorphic Malware
- Behavior-Based Detection
- Focus on the malware’s actions rather than its code structure.
- Tools like dynamic sandboxes (e.g., Cuckoo Sandbox, Any.Run) can help analyze behavior.
- Memory Analysis
- Use tools like Volatility to analyze memory dumps and capture decrypted payloads during runtime.
- Heuristic Analysis
- Employ heuristics to identify suspicious patterns, such as unusual encryption routines or self-modifying code.
- Machine Learning
- AI-driven systems can analyze behavioral patterns and detect anomalies that indicate polymorphic or metamorphic malware.
Conclusion
Polymorphic and metamorphic malware represent sophisticated threats in the cybersecurity landscape. By dynamically altering their code, these threats evade traditional detection methods, requiring advanced analysis techniques and tools to combat them. Understanding these malware types and their evasion strategies is critical for staying ahead in the ever-evolving battle against cyber threats.
We love to share our knowledge on current technologies. Our motto is ‘Do our best so that we can’t blame ourselves for anything“.