As digital surveillance and cybersecurity technologies become more sophisticated, the public debate around privacy rights and national security continues to intensify. Governments and tech companies argue for greater surveillance powers to ensure safety, while privacy advocates warn of civil liberties being eroded in the process. But how do everyday citizens—the people most affected by these systems—actually perceive the trade-offs?
This article explores findings from the book Surveillance, Privacy and Security: Citizens’ Perspectives (Routledge, 2017), specifically Chapter 1: Privacy and Security: Citizens’ Desires for an Equal Footing. Based on empirical research across European societies, the chapter reveals how ordinary people view surveillance, data protection, and the right to privacy in a digital age.
Citizens Want Both Privacy and Security—Not a Trade-Off
Contrary to the often oversimplified “privacy vs. security” narrative, the research highlights that most citizens reject the idea that these values must be in opposition.
Key insights include:
- Citizens want both privacy and security to be treated as essential and equal rights.
- The public tends to support security efforts as long as privacy protections are also respected.
- People are not anti-surveillance by default—what they oppose is unaccountable, opaque, or discriminatory surveillance practices.
For example, many support targeted surveillance in criminal investigations but oppose indiscriminate mass data collection.
Transparency, Consent, and Accountability Are Critical
The study emphasizes that trust in institutions and technologies is essential for public acceptance of surveillance systems. Citizens are more willing to support data collection when they:
- Understand what data is being collected and why
- Know who is collecting it and how it will be used
- Can opt in or out of non-essential data sharing
- See clear legal safeguards and oversight mechanisms
In short, transparency and control are the foundation of trust.
Explore more: Why Data Transparency Builds User Trust
Socio-Demographic Factors Influence Perceptions
The chapter also identifies that perceptions of privacy and security vary across different groups:
- Age: Younger people are often more comfortable sharing data, but this doesn’t mean they don’t care about privacy.
- Education: Individuals with higher digital literacy tend to ask more critical questions about surveillance and data ethics.
- Cultural Context: In societies with histories of authoritarianism, surveillance may be met with more skepticism and resistance.
These variations underline the need for inclusive, context-aware policy-making when designing digital surveillance and privacy laws.
Surveillance Must Be Proportional and Justified
Another key theme in the chapter is proportionality—citizens expect surveillance measures to be:
- Limited in scope and tied to specific threats (e.g., terrorism, organized crime)
- Time-bound, not permanent
- Subject to independent oversight
People are especially wary of “function creep,” where surveillance tools introduced for one purpose are later used for unrelated tracking or commercial profiling.
Check out: How to Prevent Function Creep in Security Tech
A Call for a New Social Contract
Ultimately, the chapter suggests that surveillance and privacy debates must evolve into a shared social contract. This means:
- Governments committing to transparent, accountable, and rights-based surveillance practices
- Citizens being actively informed and involved in discussions about data policies
- Tech companies respecting privacy as a core design principle, not an afterthought
The authors argue for co-governance—where citizens, regulators, and tech developers work together to shape the future of digital privacy and surveillance.
Final Thoughts: Designing with Citizens in Mind
The findings from Surveillance, Privacy and Security: Citizens’ Perspectives remind us that public trust is not automatic—it must be earned. When designing surveillance technologies or privacy policies, governments and organizations must:
- Avoid blanket surveillance and prioritize targeted, justified interventions
- Provide user-friendly explanations of what data is collected and why
- Ensure that privacy rights are not sacrificed in the name of security
In cybersecurity and public tech systems, the user is not just a data point—they are a stakeholder.
Related Articles on BanglaTechInfo
- Privacy by Design: Embedding User Rights in App Development
- Ethical AI and User Surveillance: A Developer’s Guide
- Cybersecurity Law vs. Civil Liberties: Striking the Balance
We love to share our knowledge on current technologies. Our motto is ‘Do our best so that we can’t blame ourselves for anything“.